I don't propose to be a great writer, or even a comedian. I'm simply hoping that someone else finds some humor in the way my brain works. A "preponderance" of evidence, as we use that term in the legal field means that it is more likely than not that something did or did not occur, depending on the proponent of the claim. It's like saying "51%" of the evidence favors one side or the other. So long as 51% of this is funny, I've succeeded in my mind.
Off we go.